| > If you turn on smart filters, it'll try to club promotions / payments / forums etc. smartly. It'd be right 90% time. But my threshold would be less than 1% failure. I see. It's about as accurate for me, but I don't care much about the 10% of misclassified e-mails so I didn't even notice. > If you open an email in Inbox, it'd recommend quick action replies like "Thanks, got it." or "Lets meet" etc.. It was on spot a lot of times, but I always wanted to add something more to the message and that's why I didn't use them. I totally forgot about it. I.e. I've read an announcement of that feature, but I'm yet to see it. I don't know if it isn't available in my region yet or if I just dismissed it and forgot about it. Thanks for reminding me about it. RE apps, I haven't seen it done right yet. I still think it can be done well, but developers need to stop doing it via trivial heuristic (frequency of use) or by hooking it up to a global recommender. Hell, maybe I'll write a proof of concept over the weekend (and who knows, maybe I'll even prove myself wrong, and discover why the idea is pointless). > I think Smartness should be in "Search mode" and not "Action mode". I agree with that. I think ML would be useful in "Search mode", or "Learning mode". Actions definitely should be static, so that one can have a chance to develop habits that speed up things. |