|
|
|
|
|
by pka
3816 days ago
|
|
I agree - I really had to deobfuscate / parse the signature first before even being able to start comprehending what it is about. Not saying that there are no monster type signatures in Haskell (just recovering from one such instance in purescript-halogen), but it's really the most leightweight syntax for annotating types out there. I often use Haskell signatures in comments when writing JS or whatever, just to keep the types straight. |
|