|
|
|
|
|
by steve_k
3819 days ago
|
|
The problem that I see with the real-sense is that just like the Kinect it's based on structured light. This means that it will only work indoors (just like the Kinect). So their cool demo with putting that on a drone is kind of pointless, because who flies a drone indoors? There are now some devices available which can provide depth data through passive stereo vision. I have recently seen this one in action: http://nerian.com/products/sp1-stereo-vision/ The problem with that, however, is that it is targeted at industrial market and probably way to expensive for any ordinary consumers. I guess we will still have to wait for some major revolution in depth sensing. |
|
I fly my 35 grams drone[1] indoors all the time in my apartment. Granted, it would be bigger and heavier with an Intel real-sense processor and camera on it, but I don't think it's out of the realm of possibilities.
[1] http://flitetest.com/articles/hubsan-x4-review