[gohrt]

Even with the Update at the end, Kerr misses the point. The police are (a) using a tool that is generally known to be broken, (b) obviously lying.

He defends the court's ruling without challenging the fact that the court is relying on two known sources of misinformation while making its decision.

It is wrong -- and Kerr must know that -- to defend logic and conclusions when one knows the starting assumptions are wrong.