[such_a_casual]

I completely agree. The federal judge did in fact rule that "drinking tea and shopping at a gardening store amounts to probable cause" when he made this ruling. First of all, there is no reason for these police to be relying on field tests when conducting a SWAT raid which was planned and calculated weeks in advance. Secondly, as you pointed out, the judge ruled that these police are in no way responsible for ensuring that there's any reason to believe these tests work at all. A user in the other thread pointed out that problems with these tests have been known about for years. What evidence did these police have these tests actually detect drugs, as opposed to air? What is to prevent the police from using dowsing sticks to determine who should be raided?