[mangeletti]

Hey @mercer

Thanks for the reply. I just now saw this (haven't been nearly as active on here for the past week).

I enjoyed reading your reply. I had just one comment back:

> Isn't 'truth' really just another abstraction, but one we cannot (yet) dive into to find the underlying 'truth'?

It's not, because 'truth' is a logical construct, an a priori kind of concept, so whatever that 'truth' is that we find underneath what was once thought to be truth would just be a more fundamental truth (e.g., we discover that photons are actually an imbalance in another dimension or something).