[patcheudor]

Interestingly enough, it's also completely illegal in the US to de-auth a WiFi client which is exactly what this is doing and the disclaimer is hardly accurate:

"It may be illegal to use this script in the US."

There's no "may" about it. It is illegal:

https://www.fcc.gov/document/warning-wi-fi-blocking-prohibit...

Two wrongs really don't make a right. Without physically locating the camera you have no idea what is being deauthed. It could be a camera monitoring a locked (unavailable to the guest) room or even a neighbors camera. Not everyone out there is a perv and there are entirely legitimate and expected uses for WiFi cameras which are not creepy.

It would be better to locate the camera and if in a location where privacy is expected, simply call the police because who knows how many other victims there may have been and who knows how creepy the person who put it there is.

[prutschman]

The relevant text of the FCC enforcement advisory you just linked to is:

"No hotel, convention center, or other commercial establishment or the network operator providing services at such establishments may intentionally block or disrupt personal Wi-Fi hot spots on such premises, including as part of an effort to force consumers to purchase access to the property owner's Wi-Fi network. Such action is illegal and violations could lead to the assessment of substantial monetary penalties."

[kayfox]

Clarification: Sending deauth packets on networks you control is fine. The issue the FCC is taking is with systems that send deauth packets to other networks.