| blockchain aims to solve the "Two Generals' Problem"[0]
short explanation in video[1] On what the article says, transactions not relying on the first bitcoin blockchain are more vulnerable to 51% attacks[2].
Though if that many big corps joined, they could achieve a well established, attack-proof consensus relatively fast -
- this probably is bad news[3] for Bitcoins' blockchain "ambitions" which is considered by many a solution to de-centralize the "internet" or services depending on third parties. [0] In computing, the Two Generals Problem, is a thought experiment meant to illustrate the pitfalls and design challenges of attempting to coordinate an action by communicating over an unreliable link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Generals%27_Problem [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYduOfRLHq0 [2] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses#Attacker_has_a_lot_of_... EDIT: format, clarification UPDATE: [3] just saw the linux foundation page, this might actually be a good thing, forgive my ignorance |
PoW aims to solve that. Blockchains are just a way to store data in an agreed format with immutability and known ordering.
>On what the article says, transactions not relying on the first bitcoin blockchain are more vulnerable to 51% attacks
51% attacks are an issue for PoW systems. Private chains don't need PoW so aren't vulnerable to them.