I'm not going to get bogged down in a "no true scotsman" fallacial argument. People define themselves by these terms and the terms are also widely used. If you can't figure them out, that's on you.
It's not a No True Scotsman when there's inherent vagueness.
People define themselves by these terms and the terms are also widely used. If you can't figure them out, that's on you.
Is that so? Because I've heard definitions of "right" as variously economically liberal, economically protectionist, socially conservative, socially liberal (as in classical liberalism), non-interventionist in foreign policy, interventionist in foreign policy, anti-statist, statist and so forth.
In fact, all of these contradictory views have belonged or continue to belong to various movements categorized as "right-wing".
So I'm asking about what you mean. Or perhaps you don't mean anything and are simply looking for an ax to grind.
People define themselves by these terms and the terms are also widely used. If you can't figure them out, that's on you.
Is that so? Because I've heard definitions of "right" as variously economically liberal, economically protectionist, socially conservative, socially liberal (as in classical liberalism), non-interventionist in foreign policy, interventionist in foreign policy, anti-statist, statist and so forth.
In fact, all of these contradictory views have belonged or continue to belong to various movements categorized as "right-wing".
So I'm asking about what you mean. Or perhaps you don't mean anything and are simply looking for an ax to grind.