[iamcurious]

>you should be happy that a rich person can single-handedly give more good than most other donors taken together

How is that supposed to make me happy?

>It's results that matters.

What results beyond Zuckerberg having even more power and influence than before?

[TeMPOraL]

> How is that supposed to make me happy?

Because significantly more good is being done? It should make you happy if you care about the particular issue being solved. If not, that's fair, but it means we're not complaining about philanthropy anymore, but about rich people being rich.

[iamcurious]

You claimed I should be happy about rich people being rich. I asked how you expected me to do that.

Also, I'm not sure good is being done at all. As my second question showed.