| Thanks for the feedback! I agree it would be nice to include examples of how Readlang fits into a different people's language learning process. Here are a couple of articles I found online: - http://www.languagesurfer.com/2015/01/14/readlang-review-six... - http://www.alexstrick.com/blog/2015/9/surviving-middlebury-h... To answer your questions... | 1. is there a good way to programmatically pull out flash card information (as say a JSON object)? Is the export to Anki as a csv/tsv? Export is by CSV (or you can specify your chosen delimiter) and you can choose from a number of different fields. You can't export data from the spaced repetition algorithm since I felt it would make the UI confusing. But you can access this data via the API: https://github.com/SteveRidout/readlang-api | 2. How fleshed out is support for Chinese? What should I expect from it being in beta? Chinese, Japanese, and Thai aren't that well supported at the moment. The main omissions are: - Lack of "word" boundary detection (these languages don't use spaces to separate words)
- Lack of Pinyin translations
- Lack of word frequency lists to prioritize flashcards by usefulness. | 3. I was intrigued by the video player functionality, clicked the "Find something to watch now" on the features page. Clicked blindly. Arrived on a page of text in Spanish. Backed up. Realized that it was a mix of text articles and video articles. Scrolled down to a video article. Was very impressed with the player, but thought with a little less patience I may have missed it. This seems like an incredible feature (similar to fluentU's approach), and one that the link should take people to with as little friction as possible! Thanks, glad you like it! I agree these should be more discoverable. BTW: These videos are all added, sync'd, and shared by Readlang users using the web-app, here's a short guide: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szcvArpfxWI |
With Chinese, though, it should be simple. Just allow users to make flashcards of any number of contiguous characters. Unbound morphemes aren't something you need to worry about and even a single character part of a larger word could reasonably be a vocabulary item.