|
|
|
|
|
|
by jordigh
3845 days ago
|
|
|
> Nothing wrong with that. Much wrong with that. Mathematics should not proceed based on a secret sauce. In mathematics, the details of the computation are almost always far more interesting than the result. The details are the very raison d'être of the subject. |
|
|
Thanks god Mathematica is not mathematics the science, then, but just a tool in assisting with doing math and physics and all kinds of calculations.
>*In mathematics, the details of the computation are almost always far more interesting than the result.
Yeah, just not in any case Mathematica, Maple, R, Matlab etc were involved.