Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by puredemo 3849 days ago
Another way of looking at this is these executives didn't necessarily agree to the "social contract," they were simply born into it. There is frequently a rather pervasive attitude that life is competition and any rules were made to be broken.

Also, many would disagree that welfare makes the "world better for everyone." A more competitive outlook would say welfare simply encourages dysgenics on a massive scale and multiplies problems.

3 comments

I think some level of welfare is necessary. When you're born into poverty, you have very little control over your life - Getting out of it is nearly impossible. Society should account for this.

People born into poverty also didn't agree to any "social contract" - They were screwed from the beginning.

> Another way of looking at this is these executives didn't necessarily agree to the "social contract," they were simply born into it. There is frequently a rather pervasive attitude that life is competition and any rules were made to be broken.

All criminals think that way.

> It is related that Cherry Nose Gio, rescued from drowning, spit in the lifeguard's face: "Crumb! Worka fora living.”

The Place of Dead Roads by William S. Burroughs

Hardly limited to criminals. "I never agreed to the social contract" is a pretty frequent sentiment on HN, too.
Hard to want to do business with someone that's looking to screw me over at every opportunity. That's the problem with america today a handshake don't mean what it used to.
Their parents initially accepted the contract for them, since obviously newborn babies can't be fully-autonomous legal entities.

Most "executives" are part of a socioeconomic class who could have left for a different society/jurisdiction if they had wanted to. Staying and then quietly flaunting the "contract" is, if not "fraud", at least acting in bad-faith.