|
|
|
|
|
by zodiac
3850 days ago
|
|
> Classical computers can factor large integers. I mean, since the best-known quantum algorithm for factoring integers is asymptotically faster than the best-known classical algorithm for factoring integers, isn't there some definition of "large" for which this is no longer true? (I'm assuming you mean "classical computers can factor large integers effectively", since the class of all problems solvable by a classical computer is exactly the same as the class of all problems solvable by a quantum computer) |
|
I started this sub-thread because I'm pretty sure this statement is true. But the details are tricky.
> the best-known quantum algorithm for factoring integers is asymptotically faster than the best-known classical algorithm for factoring integers
The only reason that current commercial cryptography works is that classical computers can't factor large integers effectively. But quantum speedups to factoring isn't particularly profound, since factoring is just a small part of computing.