| > and pay obscene taxes (by third-world standards) that in the end does serve them. Of course, that is the whole point. It has to serve our economy primarily. No one is against India having it's own strong economy, why would anyone, but it is not our business to improve your economy. It sounds harsh but no one except your own people will improve your economy. You do it yourselves or no one will. > I'd love for the EU and the US to become more Anti-immigrant (thankfully it's rising) and for the populace to wake up once the industries that kept them at the top move out of there. Why would you wish that there is more anti-immigrant sentiment or even worse racism? (that sadly is happening right now) Aside from that your logic is faulty. These businesses move somewhere else because our business elite decides so and the legal framework for doing so is set up by our political elites and guess what: It is done in a way to primarily improve our own economies or our political power. If the political elite doesn't like something about the policies of country X they will put sanctions in place and our business elite will (with a few exceptions) follow. > I'm Westernized, loved America & the U.K. when I visited them and the people were awesome, but thanks to nationalities and nationalists the U.S. has imposed these arbitrary impediments designed to keep away those willing to move from their native countries to further their careers. We are nation states with citizenships and borders. All of our states primarily serve their own citizens, not others. There is no human right allowing me to live in Monaco, Tokyo or New Dheli just because I want to further my career. The only exception is asylum for persons that are threatened in their own countries, but aside from that there is no obligation whatsoever. |