|
|
|
|
|
by JimmyM
3850 days ago
|
|
This is a reference to Thing Explainer, the Randall Munroe book - https://xkcd.com/thing-explainer/ I think since so much quantum physics depends on maths, which in turn depends on highly specialised terminology or at least symbols, you are right that a Thing Explainer might have serious difficulty with quantum physics. A broad overview probably wouldn't have a serious advantage over the various lay explanations and thought experiments that are floating around at the moment. But as a non-physics student with an imperfect understanding of linear algebra, I would love to be proven wrong! |
|