|
|
|
|
|
by mc32
3838 days ago
|
|
It's debatable. Do you stand aside and look the other way and say, that's their lot in the world, or do you do something. It's not an was call. If you do nothing people die. If you try to do something people will die. The idea is to pave a better path to the future. To be sure, going into Iraq was a fools errand, but it's more difficult to make the call about lets say strife in Africa, or the Caucasus, etc. Or even today, do we say, forget Syria. Seal it up, let them sort things out and condemn a whole country's population to great suffering? |
|
> It's not an was call. If you do nothing people die. If you try to do something people will die. The idea is to pave a better path to the future.
This was the propaganda used to excuse invading Iraq, but it's incredibly naive to believe it.
> Or even today, do we say, forget Syria. Seal it up, let them sort things out and condemn a whole country's population to great suffering?
That's exactly what we'd be doing if they weren't sitting in the way of fossil fuel transportation routes.
It's ridiculous to claim that we're doing this to reduce the suffering of people in Syria. The US has supplied Israel with bombs that have been used to kill Syrian civilians for more than half a century, yet suddenly we care about the suffering of Syrians now? Yeah, right.