[dstyrb]

I, for one, am glad they split that article into two pages; I was getting a bit intimidated by the length.

[hackbinary]

I didn't even notice that it was split into two pages.

I also appreciated that they left out the detail on what the intended purpose for Les 1 and Les 2 was, so they wouldn't confuse anyone with too much information.

http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/les-1.htm

[iraphael]

I also appreciated the fact that they overrode the browser's default scrolling to a less natural speed, and in doing so, also prevented me from being able to use gestures to return to hacker news.

[jimhefferon]

Yes, I often I judge the journalistic source by the links to other articles. Here, I judge that the source is very interested in the word "dirty". That makes a ham radio article all the more .. unexpected.

[hoinz]

lol, but then I realized.. maybe it's done on purpose to validate an article's appeal.

[Sir_Cmpwn]

It's done on purpose to get more ads to your eyeballs.

[ohitsdom]

Which is silly since the same ads show on both pages. But I guess the site can charge twice...