|
|
|
|
|
by austenallred
3854 days ago
|
|
>All the evidence shows that programming requires a high level of aptitude that only a small percentage of the population possess. >The current fad for short learn-to-code courses is selling people a lie and will do nothing to help the skills shortage for professional programmers. Outside the obvious lack of definition as to what a "programmer" actually is, this is a non sequitur (the conclusion doe not follow). There's an assumption built in that those who do possess a high level of aptitude already have CS degrees or are self-taught because it comes to them naturally. What if there are people who possess that high level of aptitude and they want something to help them learn in a structured way? Extrapolated, the author's argument could be seen as, "Sorry, there's no point in teaching programming, because everyone with the aptitude to program already knows how to program," and I think that is a recognizable falsehood, if only anecdotally. In other words, even given the assumption that programming does require a higher aptitude than some subset of the population does possess, there is no surefire way to determine who that subset is based on credentialing. |
|
Sounds like a reasonable argument to me.