[golergka]

> I'm merely pointing out that the original comment is automatically assuming that the author's story is untrue. And that the comment makes a clear call for more proof.

Of course I do, because this is the default attitude one should have when approaching such stories on the internet.

This whole story could be complete fiction that never took place from the beginning to the end, unless you actually make an effort to locate and probably contact (since I don't think they would bother to publish any involved materials) the officials and departments involved. Have you?

This web-page is literally the only source we have. How the hell are we supposed to trust it by default?