|
|
|
|
|
by charlesdm
3865 days ago
|
|
It was, but it would be in place regardless of whether you succeeded or not. Maybe not historically, but today, whether I personally succeed or not doesn't matter to the budget/deficit. Those who carry the taxable base are the middle class; the employees who can't restructure their affairs. Paying back / forward is great, but (imo) it has a limit. Unless you inherited your wealth, most people who are self made will have paid a significant amount of tax before they tax optimise their structures. So, if you’re a success, you will have paid back your “debt” to society (and then some). There needs to be a limit somewhere. Some countries are more aggressive (i.e. the US) in collecting their tax dollars than others (i.e. the UK). |
|
There is no such thing.
A single child raised to finish college costs the taxpayer in Germany 300'000 Euro in subsidized nursery, free school, and free college.
Additionally, each person costs a lot for roads, public transit, etc.
And then you have to add in that for every person who gets to become a billionaire, you have hundredthousands who won’t become billionaires, but still cost you equally much. There’s no way to find out who is going to become a self-made millionaire, and who isn’t.
And society already tries to provide many programs only to those kids with high potential, to save money. Programs like this [1] are already exclusive.
If you want to give the generation of your kids the same chances at becoming self-made millionaires, you have to provide all of them with this high quality service.
Which means you have to accept nominal tax rates of 48%+.
[1] http://www.enrichment.lernnetz.de/content/information.php