|
|
|
|
|
by j_baker
6002 days ago
|
|
The assumption is that learning things increases your execution time. In the very short term this is true. However, if you'd spent all the time learning the things that you wanted to learn, how much more productive would you be? It's like Jeff Bezos said: "I always tell people, if we have a good quarter it's because of the work we did three, four, and five years ago. It's not because we did a good job this quarter." This is a pattern that I've (anecdotally) noticed in successful entrepreneurs and programmers... the ability to focus on the long term at the expense of the short term
(but without sacrificing the short-term). Long story short, if you are in an employment situation where your employer will not let you spend any more time learning new things, you should consider employment elsewhere. |
|
I totally agree with your long term statement. And I do also agree with you on the fact that just learning without execution renders your learning useless.
The thing is, how do you juggle between these two extremes? @imp notes below:
"I let my own ambitions determine which zone I'm in, and they last from a couple weeks to months."
The cycle seems to come naturally to him. For others like @Ixiaus it takes more conscious effort (I assume, since he quit his job to be able to learn the things which matter to him).