[throwaway_ghj]

> most coding is treated as a commodity by the business world, and the younger devs have a cost advantage over you.

I have an experience advantage of being able to ship working software that actually meets requirements. Unlike many younger devs.

[smt88]

I agree that an experienced coder is more cost effective. But, like I said, coding is treated as a commodity, so lay/businesspeople have a hard time accepting that. They don't understand how awful and unmaintainable a novice's code is.

[marssaxman]

I'm happy not working for that kind of meat-grinder company. If all they see when they look at me is a price tag, they clearly aren't the kind of place that can offer work that would be worth my time.

[pshyco]

Good thought but not everyone can apply. People have family to feed, debts to clear and have little or no choice !

[marssaxman]

What makes you think I don't? But there are choices, because I live in Seattle. It'd be harder for people not living in a tech hub. Location makes far more difference in one's ability to find a job than a surplus of age/experience/salary, I think.