|
|
|
|
|
|
by saiya-jin
3868 days ago
|
|
|
still waiting for that scientific backing, I don't see any outright proven threat. on the other hand, if this extra "power" allows us to create plants to feed hungry ie in Africa where usual crops wouldn't survive, that sounds like a real added value. or you want to explain a starving child that it should rather die because you don't like how the results are obtained? |
|
|
We don't need scientific backing: it should be proven safe before using. Not proven a threat then removed from the market. Some of these things can be difficult to reverse.
The issue in Africa isn't a lack of food worldwide, it's distribution.