[gozo]

You're just stating opinions. Why would that be interesting in this discussion? This is the Internet, there's no lack of opinions. You haven't responded with proper arguments to anyone is this thread, which seems to be consistent with your comment history. Maybe all those people you're not responding to are also PC?

> It seems that the actions of the terrorists allow for a fairly easy us vs them categorization.

Why? For you?

> yet the terrorists all come from specific subset

What subset is that? Plenty of terrorism isn't based on religion.

> So there is some commonality between them [...]

And that is? Of course there's some commonality, but you actually have to specify which and why to have an argument.

> Ferguson doesn't shy away from putting light on it

What part of his writing does that? The part I've read very much paints with broad strokes and doesn't at all focus on "the commonality of a specific subset of terrorists". As you would expect from a history professor.

[omonra]

You seem to take things fairly personally and I don't think proceeding in this key would be productive.