Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gregoreous 3865 days ago
I hope you don't mind my taking this post as an open invitation for anyone to reply to, but I thought I should reply as well.

1. I love talking to people with different beliefs. If we have a respectful debate based on our best evidence I assume we will both learn something.

2. Facts are facts. However, I think all people build world views around those facts which interpret those facts in ways that are consistent with their non-scientific beliefs. The scientific method is just a important to me as an agnostic in terms of whether a medical procedure is safe.

3. See answer 2. Many Christians have no trouble with evolution. It was discovered by an Anglican after all. It's true that Darwin lost his faith over the discovery, but after a few years, many Christians just incorporated it into their faith.

4. It is very hard to prove historical facts, but there is good evidence for many arguments (like the resurrection for example; or that the King James Bible was developed by a committee). I think for many Christians, good historical scholarship is fundamental to the sorts of things that they now believe. This works both ways; however. For example, after the Divinci Code came out I was able to quickly discard the sorts of claims it made because the evidence was so bad. Similarly, Richard Dawkins should not give up his day job to become a biblical scholar since he doesn't seem to have the knack for it.

Cheers

1 comments

I'm not sure why you conflate the fiction of The Da Vinci Code with the cogent writings of Dawkins.