Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by snogglethorpe 3872 days ago
libpng is actually very easy to use directly.

Some other image libraries are hard because they force you to write many code-paths to handle various different cases, but libpng provides many different helpers that make it pretty simple.
1 comments
AndyKelley 3872 days ago
Are you referring to setjmp? Because it's quite the opposite. This blog article does a good job explaining: http://latentcontent.net/2007/12/05/libpng-worst-api-ever/
link
snogglethorpe 3871 days ago
Huh? I'm not referring to setjmp at all... (why would you think I'm referring to setjmp?)

The PNG format has lots of variations and optional bits that would be quite annoying if you needed to handle them all yourself. I'm referring to the many various flags, options, and little helper functions in libpng that make handling all these format variations quite painless for the user of libpng.

[Some libraries, e.g. libtiff, provide mechanisms to abstract out the low-level details, but still expect the application to explicitly handle many format variations, and this is quite annoying.]

libpng is hardly perfect; it's old, and that certainly shows in various ways (e.g. the use of setjmp). But to call it the "worst API ever" is just wrong.

link
AndyKelley 3871 days ago
Ah, I thought you were referring to setjmp with this:

> Some other image libraries are hard because they force you to write many code-paths to handle various different cases, but libpng provides many different helpers that make it pretty simple.

It seemed that you were thinking of error code handling as a "code-path" and setjmp/longjmp being a mechanism to reduce code paths.

Anyway, it sounds like we're in agreement. It's not that big of a deal to use libpng directly, and "worst API ever" is too strong. The author has probably not done enough Windows API programming to find the worst API ever :-).

link