[vox_mollis]

I can only assume you're trolling, or an incredibly obsequious shill for federal power.

The only time an attorney will defend you without both a retainer and on-time payments is when your particular case is high enough profile to make pro-bono work worth it in terms of publicity. Your odds of this circumstance are less than one percent.

Federal prosecutors have extremely high conviction( or rather, plea )rates because they live and breathe by the extraordinarily asymmetrical power wielded over their victims. That you defend this asymmetry is sickening.

Ironically, with this case making the WaPo, she will likely find easy pro-bono work now. That vast majority of us? Probably not.

[Laaw]

Currently? Yes. If this case gets decided such that non-criminal assets can be frozen? No.

I'm explaining that law firms won't simply cease to exist if this case gets decided a certain way, which is what folks here seem to be implying. It's not an insurmountable hurdle.

Bill collection will adjust if it has to. Are you suggesting it won't?