|
|
|
|
|
by AnAfrican
3878 days ago
|
|
That's very simplistic. Here's a great case : It is often said that the West picked Mobutu over Lumumba because the lattest was seen as a threat to mining interests. Yet Mobutu nationalized the mines, then nationalized and redistributed most foreign assets. And yet he was still supporter by the West. The explanation: Mobutu played his cards right. The West was worried about Communism, he declared himself as strongly anti-communist and that was enough. |
|
Remember there were often multiple competing powers each eager to sabotage the others if they couldn't get what they wanted.
Sometimes a corrupt government was a sort of "area denial" on resources. The old "If I can't get them, then neither can you" approach.