|
|
|
|
|
by jwilkins
3879 days ago
|
|
Interestingly, I put the same bug in at HackerOne 9 months ago. It was closed as not applicable. So they had at least two independent reports of the same bug and failed to understand it, acknowledge it and then fix it. Way to go slack. If you have any critical data passing through slack, when you get owned, you won't be able to say say it wasn't entirely preventable. |
|