|
|
|
|
|
by beachstartup
3881 days ago
|
|
> Won’t a bit flip probability be linked to the size of the critical os code size no, there are a wide range of memory conditions in which a kernel calls panic, and memory doesn't just flip single bits when it errors out, although that's certainly possible. |
|
It is not flip errors per say that causes kernel panics (it is not going to cause any problems if a section of unallocated memory has a bit flip), but the probability of an uncorrected bit flip in a critical memory location. I am certainly willing to be corrected, but if don’t see how increasing the amount of non-critical memory increases the chance of a kernel panic.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_memory