|
|
|
|
|
|
by nickpsecurity
3886 days ago
|
|
|
Me too. Figure something good enough to replace C++ immediately and better to develop with would make for a better compiler. Not to mention all the advantages of writing a compiler in the language in question. Only exception I promote is writing compilers in ML (esp Ocaml) because it's so good at doing that correctly. A concentration of compiler writers on such a great tool can only lead to an ecosystem whose quality C or C++ compilers will have trouble matching. Rewriting and testing the LLVM system at the least would be a good thing. |
|
|