[pjmlp]

Are you sure? I remember reading something about PL/I. :)

[nickpsecurity]

Maybe PL/S, IBM's "secret weapon," (haha) would be better if we're talking C++ replacements. I did like how the language let you describe how exactly the compiler should handle the individual function. I can see that have payoff in OS and security-critical software.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PL/S

[pjmlp]

Interesting, I wasn't aware of it.

[epoch1970]

Walter has been around a long time. He knows the game. Walter, have you ever used PL/I?

[WalterBright]

Nope. But Pascal was so simple that a listing for a working subset compiler for it (written in BASIC) was published in BYTE magazine back in the 70s.

But I (and many other compiler devs) thought back in the early 80's that Ada was so complex it was unimplementable. Today that thought seems charmingly naive.

[pjmlp]

I have spent quite some time in D forums....

EDIT: typo, time was missing