|
|
|
|
|
by jandrese
3885 days ago
|
|
The current regulation has been pretty effective at what it was intended to do: stop the production of nuclear power plants without the politically unpopular attempt to outright ban them. People saw Chernobyl and said "none of that in my backyard" and successfully managed to write rules so onerous that they're effectively a ban. Unfortunately, any plans they had for a solar power revolution in the 70s died when the technology turned out to be outrageously expensive and impractical, and we've been stuck burning coal waiting for the technology to catch up. 40 years of filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses because of one spectacular failure halfway around the world and one scare in our own country. Another irony is the fact that all of our current reactors are old designs and less safe than new ones would be if we were allowed to build them. Of course all of the political pressure has also killed our waste management plan as well, so everybody has to make due with less safe ad-hoc setups on every site. |
|