|
|
|
|
|
by eivarv
3883 days ago
|
|
Reproducibility does not necessarily mean that other people should be able to reproduce the results in question (which would depend upon them knowing the relevant information in the first place) - but that an experiment can be replicated. I would agree that publishing results is better for several reasons (ethics, pragmatism, probably more thorough evaluation, etc.), but the definition doesn't really deal with the public at all. TLDR; Reproducibility != public reproducibility. |
|