[dalke]

Did you really just argue that if a snake were to kill your child, you would want the species eradicated?

If an automobile driver were the cause of death instead, would you demand the removal of all automobile drivers? Or all automobiles?

If your child were to drown, would you demand the removal of all swimming pools?

[jmnicolas]

Oh common stop putting words in my mouth ...

When a specie is invasive and dangerous you thin it by removing the ones that are too close to human habitat, that's it.

[dalke]

Your response was to the statement by igravious, which highlighted "Sharks", "big cats", and "snakes".

Two of those are not invasive species at all. Of the third, only a few species of snakes are invasive. You'll also notice that sharks have not gotten closer to human habitation in any significant way.

So your response is almost irrelevant to what igravious was talking about.

I assumed it was relevant, and the only way I could figure out how to assume you mean that human (and more specifically child) safety gets priority over everything else.

If someone wants to live in or move to a place with big cats, then your view is that they should kill (or "thin") the species, yes? Eventually this means the extinction of all potentially dangerous creatures, does it not?

[jmnicolas]

Do you see even what you do ? Your way of framing this argument can only lead to a fight.

Of course you have to be 2 to fight, so I'm going to be reasonable and just drop the matter. I don't NEED to be right. Have a nice day.