[dang]

> Apple didn't actually open-source the code.

In that case you shouldn't have said they did in the title.

We changed the title from "Apple open-sources cryptography library (limited, see license)". If there's an issue with the license, by all means point this out, but please use a comment in the thread to do so. Using the story title to point out what you think is the most important bit breaks the HN rule against editorializing.