[GeneralMayhem]

>SEC. 6. JUDICIAL REVIEW AND ENFORCEABILITY.

>(a) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—There shall be no judicial review of compliance or noncompliance with any provision of this Act.

>(b) ENFORCEABILITY.—No provision of this Act shall be construed to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any administrative or judicial action.

I'm not particularly familiar with the intricacies of self-regulation in the US government; if judges can't review whether an agency is following the rule, and individuals don't have grounds to force the matter because it's not a "right or benefit", does this mean that there's no enforceability at all, or is there some other mechanism not mentioned here that kicks in by default?

[dragonwriter]

Its essentially unenforceable: the only avenue left is Congress using violations as motivations for future action, but Congress doesn't need a law for a basis of that. Its pretty much purely symbolic.

[EvanPlaice]

I love sites like this because there's always that one person who can swiftly dig through all the BS and nail the point.

Thank you