|
How important is it to your future fundraising/professional network potential to exit your company versus jut shut it down, if either are an option? How do you weigh the opportunity cost (shutdown = move on immediately, versus M&A seems to be at least 6mos to term sheet, 12 mos retention)? My personal situation: I'm co-founder of a company that is * 7 years old, 6 team members
* 900K ARR, 25% operating profit margins, 13% CAGR
* no investors, bootstrapped
The business in its current state could continue indefinitely, but requires active management and engineering. We don't see a believable path to high growth in the current market, and my co-founder would like to leave by end of year. My options are:(A) Help him EOL the company by 12/31 (and walk away with $0). (b) Transition to CEO and drive the M&A process on my own (he leaves as soon as possible). We estimate 20% chance of a $2-3M exit, 60% chance of a 500K-1M market share sale. In worst case, shutdown the company on my own in June (estimate 200K walk away cash at that point). Ultimately, I would like to start a new company ASAP. However, I have little capital runway (maybe 8mos), no significant VC network, and no other exit on my resume. What's the best choice given the circumstances? |
It's profitable and worth something to buyers. The engineering team alone would be worth a fair amount per head in terms of recruitment. You can delegate the leg work to brokers if you don't want to spend that much time on an acquisition.
It's not important to have an exit per se (though nearly any transfer of assets can be called an exit). The experience of running a business (a profitable one at that) is a positive signal to future partners/investors.