[just_curioussss]

That is called unspecified behavior not undefined behavior. Major difference.

[mlvljr]

Not many know (and less people care), funnily :)

I have yet to see a thorough (source-to-compiler-intent-to-assembly) comparative description of undefined, unspecified and implementation-defined behaviors, though (not just a somewhat insightful blog, or techno gospel, which the C and C++ standards are).

[nitrogen]

You could always write one. I recommend the work of John Regehr as a starting reference: http://blog.regehr.org/

[mlvljr]

I wish I had time to learn this first :)

But yes, authoring a book titled "Well-defined C (and C++)" one day would be awesome.

Thanks for the link.