[joshuawarner32]

One of the core contributors here. I don't have any numbers, but I can reasonably guess it'll only beat the most naive JITs (i.e., JITs that only copy predefined templates that implement each instruction). Avian's JIT does no optimizations beyond a simple linear-time register allocator and a very basic instruction selector. Avian can run a simple Hello World somewhat faster than HotSpot, but that's about all. In any real-world scenarios, HotSpot and Dalvik/ART will kick the pants off it.

However, that's not what Avian is designed for. We (ReadyTalk) don't have the resources to compete in that sort of market, as fun as that might be. We designed Avian to run a relatively light-weight client application, so we can deploy the same code across all our platforms. We're not running a game or a server, so we don't care a lot frame rate or requests per second.

[lmm]

> However, that's not what Avian is designed for. We (ReadyTalk) don't have the resources to compete in that sort of market, as fun as that might be. We designed Avian to run a relatively light-weight client application, so we can deploy the same code across all our platforms. We're not running a game or a server, so we don't care a lot frame rate or requests per second.

I still don't see how it's better than Java in that scenario, which also runs on all platforms?

[sesteel]

It really stems from the need to deliver commercial software to enterprise customers on a variety of platforms. At least some (if not many) enterprise customers don't want to roll out Java across all of their clients machines. Additionally, not all enterprise customers have the privileges required to install Java themselves. The bundling of the application into a single executable file is advantageous in this scenario.