|
|
|
|
|
|
by marcosdumay
3898 days ago
|
|
|
Nope if I read that right. They made a simulation with random data. It explained 70% of the measured impact attributed to CEOs. A prove that it's random can not be explained by claiming that it depends on anything. But it still leaves those 30% to be explained by something else. |
|
|