|
|
|
|
|
|
by cornellwright
3892 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, but how do you stop that? Isn't any investment in a company involved in litigation implicitly an investment in the litigation? (Or at least a bet that the litigation isn't material to their business.) The whole SCO vs IBM case was pretty unscrupulous, sleazy, and opportunistic, I agree. I'm not arguing that I have the solution to stop abuses like this. I'm saying that limiting financing is not it. |
|
|
Not by limiting financing, but by recognizing and shutting down barratry and stunts.