|
|
|
|
|
|
by 336f5
3889 days ago
|
|
|
> The point remains the article specifically cites a situation where the adoption process fails No, it doesn't. The article vaguely alludes to a third-hand description of the failure of a legal tactic which taken literally is nonsensical; and as far as I can tell, when those two people tried in the sensible standard manner used by everyone else (the manner in which the article is about), did succeed. |
|
|
Yes, it does. It literally has that, right there, in the text. As quoted, you are factually incorrect.