[pjc50]

"free movement of capital, goods and manpower": but not taxation. There's no real counterbalancing mechanism to the downsides of such movement.

The EU can't work without US-style federalism and the erasure of national identities. So yes, it probably should be disbanded.

Edit: or at least abolish Luxembourg, which is a stupid statelet left over from the treaty of Utrecht: http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/10/21/2142483/the-case-again...

[fauigerzigerk]

Historical processes take their time. The old ways of working in Europe don't solve these taxation issues either, on the contrary. So let's move forward instead of backwards!

It makes no sense to scrap the only hope for shaping Europe in a consensual and constructive way just because it isn't perfect yet. Otherwise it's national interests against national interests once again.

[icebraining]

"US-style federalism"? The politics and $1B+ in tax breaks and perks paid by Nevada to get the Gigafactory say otherwise.

[s73v3r]

There's still Federal taxes which get paid, and distributed out to the states. Whereas there is no "EU" tax that gets distributed to the member states.

[ptaipale]

EU levies "EU taxes" to its member countries and then distributes part of the money back. It doesn't collect these taxes directly from EU citizens, but that doesn't mean the tax incidence wouldn't be on citizens.

EU collects about 0.3 % of VAT revenue of each country, and about 0.7 % of GDB of each country as a membership fee (which is the largest source of income).

EU also keeps most of the import duties levied on non-EU products.

http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/money/revenue-in...

[lhopki01]

The US is worse of in this regard. The EU has rules about state aid that the US doesn't. In the US, states give enormous tax breaks to companies to set up a factory in their state. In the EU that sort of thing is illegal.