|
|
|
|
|
by thaumasiotes
3898 days ago
|
|
I recently interviewed with a company that had advertised (in my paraphrase) "we've noticed that a lot of perfectly good developers do poorly in interviews for reasons that appear to be unrelated to job performance. So you can now interview with us by completing a project on your own time, and during the interview we'll talk about that". My project was a regex matcher. I ended up getting the following feedback: > We thought you wrote a great, very full featured regular expression matcher. It was especially impressive how much you dug into the academics behind regular languages. > However we made the decision because we felt that while going through the project together during the interview, we didn't see the fluency of programming when adding to it that we had hoped for. While we specifically designed the take home project track to help overcome the difficulties of coding under time pressure with someone watching, we do still need to see a certain level of programming during the interview. This didn't seem to be the case here. It's hard to know what to do with that. :/ |
|