|
|
|
|
|
by sridca
3900 days ago
|
|
> I never understood this stigma about hermits/social isolation in western societies. In the east, it's much more accepted. In east it is much more accepted? Where exactly in the east? At least from where I come from (southern state in India), being a loner -- especially a loner male -- is seen to be socially unworthy. I know one male relative, that had been divorced and never married since then, who is generally looked down by all of extended family. Being a hermit with religious/spiritual affiliations on the other hand is different thing entirely. Normal people from my country are expected to fulfill their social responsibilities and duties which, for the men-folk, means supporting their families (women and children) ... and this is far from being accepted as a socially isolated person. Why, every time I visit my folks in India, our relatives are quick to point out the apparent (to them) deficiency in my life just because I don't have a marital partner to spend my life with (for the Western folks here, they continue to see me as that "lonely old man sitting in the park bench"). |
|
EDIT:
It's also funny that you mentioned the spiritual angle.
I've studied Advaita for many years (and still practice it) and there is something to be said about the various holy men who practice it. In the case of Nisargadatta, for instance, he had a wife and kids that he immediately abandoned once he met sri sadguru sidarameshwar maharaj and fully commited to that path.
If you read his books (highly recommended) you will discover a man that lives in absolute bliss. It's like a huge weight has been lifted off of his shoulders, and I don't just mean his family (more like the burden of having to interact with society at large).
It's interesting to me how this is "accepted" in India but a person acting in exactly the same ways minus the spiritual angle is treated far differently. If that is not social conditioning I don't know what is.