[KirinDave]

You're welcome to disagree, but keep in mind exactly the context and conversation you've decided to take up championing photographer's rights in.

This is what sexism is made of. Just fyi. Your principles protecting an abstract group of people outweighs even entertaining the condemnation of a very real and very outrageous violation of personal space and rights.

[mc32]

We're having a discussion here. I's not a singular track. We can discuss ancillary things.

Yes, totally people who act immature and grotesquely should be called out and that behavior not tolerated. Still, I do defend photographers who yes, get harassed by uninformed people. They really find it unbelievable that photographers have a right to take pictures in public without permission.

You, a self described street photographer, seem unaware of the long street photography tradition, so how do you expect a bystander to understand photographers' rights[1] backed by the ACLU?

[1]https://www.aclu.org/issues/free-speech/photographers-rights

[KirinDave]

And by "discuss ancillary things" you mean one non-committal post about how bad those people are, but how they have a right to do it. Mysteriously, the vast majority of your posts are on this vein of the topic.

P.S., I've no need to entertain your bullshit about how my photography isn't street enough for you. Find something useful to add to the conversation.