Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tcdent 6009 days ago
It's my understanding that the original reason behind the closed architecture of the iPhone was to keep the device secure on cell networks. Most of the restrictions are there to protect outside access, which is a good thing for the less savvy users. Plenty believe the App Store and SDK were an afterthought, added only after people grumbled about the restrictions of web-only apps, which were the simplest way to guarantee 3rd party software was safe.

Without the risk of an insecure cellular network, greed would be the only motivating factor in keeping this a closed device.
2 comments
atarashi 6009 days ago
the original reason behind the closed architecture of the iPhone was to keep the device secure on cell networks

That's probably true for the iPhone, but it doesn't explain the closed nature of the iPod Touch. The two devices share the same core OS, but it wouldn't be difficult to let iPod Touch users download apps outside of the app store. So if its not about protecting the cellular networks, and it's not a technological barrier, what's left? I guess you could argue it's about control or about enforcing a consistent (and "safe") user experience. I'm hoping they don't apply the same thinking to the Tablet.

link
mkinsella 6009 days ago
Without the risk of an insecure cellular network, greed would be the only motivating factor in keeping this a closed device.

What about the rumors that the Tablet will include nationwide 3G access, similar to the Kindle? I believe this is a necessary addition -- think about how useful the iPhone would be without Edge/3G access: not at all.

link