|
|
|
|
|
by JesperRavn
3903 days ago
|
|
It makes sense. Advertising is inefficient, wasting people's time and attention for the gain of the advertiser. Advertisements have long been used as a form of micropayment, to fund first TV shows and now websites, where a monetary payment would be infeasible. There is no such reason to allow advertising in public property (private property is more complicated, but generally the outward appearance of buildings is considered a public good, and highly regulated). The person viewing the building or billboard is not a party to a transaction, so there is no reason to charge that person a hidden fee for viewing that space. In a way it is the ultimate hidden tax. |
|